Daniel Z. Meyer

604 citations
10 papers · 435 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Z. Meyer

10 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Daniel Z. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58
  • Education 201
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 61
  • Architecture 6
  • Safety Research 22
Replace Leanne M. Avery with:
Leanne M. Avery United States
Judith Anderson Koenig United States
Kathleen S. Davis United States
Kerstin Carlson Le Floch United States
Michelle L. Melton United States
Dawn Garbett New Zealand
Sandra Johnson United Kingdom
Patricia D. Morrell United States
Donald C. Orlich United States
Martha Naomi Alt United States
Daniel Z. Meyer relative to Leanne M. Avery United States Leanne M. Avery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leanne M. Avery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Z. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Z. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Z. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Z. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Z. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Z. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Z. Meyer. The network helps show where Daniel Z. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Z. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Z. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Z. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2008242
2 2012107
3 201652
4 201123
5 20174
6
Why Inquiry Is Inherently Difficult. . . and Some Ways to Make It Easier
20102
7 20102
8
Eight Ways to Do Inquiry.
20121
9
Designing Design Challenges: Getting the Details Right.
20121
10
Eight Ways to Do Inquiry: A Study of over 300 Inquiry Activities Recommends Eight Models for the Classroom
20121

About Daniel Z. Meyer

Daniel Z. Meyer is a scholar working on Education, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science Education and Pedagogy (8 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (3 papers), Innovative Teaching Methods (3 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (1 paper), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper) and Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (58 citations), Education (201 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (61 citations), Architecture (6 citations) and Safety Research (22 citations). Daniel Z. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Leanne M. Avery and Allison Antink‐Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Field Methods, Journal of Science Teacher Education, School Science and Mathematics, Research in Science Education and Studies in Science Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact