Daniel Sherman
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Global Health Care Issues
-
- Social Media in Health Education
Papers in
-
- Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer 2
- Healthcare Policy and Management 1
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 1
-
- Health Literacy and Information Accessibility 1
- Global Health Care Issues 1
- Co-authors
- Marc N. Elliott (1 shared paper)Teague Ruder (1 shared paper)Allen M. Fremont (1 shared paper)Nicole Lurie (1 shared paper)Bonnie Ghosh‐Dastidar (1 shared paper)José J. Escarce (1 shared paper)Laurie T. Martin (1 shared paper)Chloe E. Bird (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Health Affairs (1 paper)Journal of General Internal Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Oncology Practice (1 paper)Clinical journal of oncology nursing (1 paper)Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Daniel Sherman
7 papers receiving 322 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- General Health Professions 130
- Health 23
- Family Practice 5
- Economics and Econometrics 71
- Oncology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Sherman. The network helps show where Daniel Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 169 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 20 | |
| 6 | The Ad Hoc Committee Report on estimating the future workforce and training requirements for nephrology | 1997 | 16 |
| 7 | 1989 | 1 |
About Daniel Sherman
Daniel Sherman is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education and Epidemiology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (1 paper), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Global Health Care Issues (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (1 paper) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (130 citations), Health (23 citations), Family Practice (5 citations), Economics and Econometrics (71 citations) and Oncology (45 citations). Daniel Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc N. Elliott, Teague Ruder, Allen M. Fremont, Nicole Lurie, Bonnie Ghosh‐Dastidar, José J. Escarce, Laurie T. Martin, Chloe E. Bird, Kristen L. Fessele and John J. Stasik. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Journal of Oncology Practice, Clinical journal of oncology nursing and Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.