Daniel Scherzer

613 citations
33 papers · 368 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Scherzer

29 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Daniel Scherzer
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Family Practice 28
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 37
  • Emergency Medical Services 45
  • Emergency Medicine 53
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 21
Replace David Kaegi with:
David Kaegi United States
Bradford C. Smith United States
Sharon Griswold‐Theodorson United States
Kelly L. Dodge United States
Makani Purva United Kingdom
Johan N Siebert Switzerland
Krista L. Turner United States
Arna Banerjee United States
Allison Murphy United States
Willem L. van Meurs United States
Daniel Scherzer relative to David Kaegi United States David Kaegi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×42×
David Kaegi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Scherzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Scherzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Scherzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Scherzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Scherzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Scherzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Scherzer. The network helps show where Daniel Scherzer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Scherzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Scherzer Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Scherzer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201882
2 201141
3 201829
4 201225
5 200419
6 201817
7 202016
8 201715
9 201715
10 201614
11 201912
12 201711
13 201311
14 20149
15 20217
16 20166
17 20206
18 20206
19 20135
20 20165

About Daniel Scherzer

Daniel Scherzer is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Physiology, Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medical Services and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Disaster Response and Management (5 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (3 papers), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (3 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (3 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (2 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (28 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (37 citations), Emergency Medical Services (45 citations), Emergency Medicine (53 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (21 citations). Daniel Scherzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marc Auerbach, Travis Whitfill, Werner Purgathofer, Rachel Stanley, Michael Wimmer, Junxin Shi, Henry Xiang, Joseph D. Tobias, Mark X. Cicero and Maria Carmen G. Diaz. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Pediatrics, Pediatric Emergency Care, Computer Graphics Forum, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine and Academic Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact