Daniel Rosenbaum

11 papers receiving 260 citations

Peers

Daniel Rosenbaum
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Clinical Psychology 247
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
  • Organic Chemistry 179
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 37
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
Replace Emma Hapke with:
Emma Hapke Canada
Lê-Anh Dinh-Williams Canada
Jordan Sloshower United States
Abigail E. Calder Switzerland
Taylor Lyons United Kingdom
Erwin Krediet Netherlands
Helena Aicher Switzerland
Nathalie M. Rieser Switzerland
L. Taylor Flynn United States
Michael P. Bremmer United States
Daniel Rosenbaum relative to Emma Hapke Canada Emma Hapke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emma Hapke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Rosenbaum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Rosenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Rosenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Rosenbaum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Rosenbaum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Rosenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Rosenbaum. The network helps show where Daniel Rosenbaum may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Rosenbaum, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Rosenbaum Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Rosenbaum links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2019107
2 201983
3 202040
4 201914
5 20248
6 20246
7 20235
8 20244
9
Topical steroids more effective than antifungals for chronic paronychia.
20023
10 20241
11 20231
12 20250

About Daniel Rosenbaum

Daniel Rosenbaum is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Organic Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Complementary and alternative medicine and Physiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (8 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (2 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (1 paper), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (1 paper) and Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (247 citations), Biological Psychiatry (20 citations), Organic Chemistry (179 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (79 citations). Daniel Rosenbaum has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Emma Hapke, Katrina Hui, Lê-Anh Dinh-Williams, Thomas Anderson, Cory R. Weissman, Rotem Petranker, Norman A. S. Farb, Daniel Z. Buchman, Setareh Ziai and Martin Chasen. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Public Health Ethics, Harm Reduction Journal, Annals of Palliative Medicine and Journal of Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact