Daniel Radford‐Smith

25 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers

Daniel Radford‐Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Biological Psychiatry 73
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 25
  • Physiology 68
  • Hepatology 16
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 30
Replace Charles P. Mercado with:
Charles P. Mercado United States
Said İncir Türkiye
Jody Rusch South Africa
Mei‐Hsin Hsu Taiwan
Katrine Grau Denmark
Hatice Yorulmaz Türkiye
Brittany Simpson United States
M. Laundy United Kingdom
Neelima Dubey India
Sonia Nuñez United States
Daniel Radford‐Smith relative to Charles P. Mercado United States Charles P. Mercado's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Charles P. Mercado · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Radford‐Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Radford‐Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Radford‐Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Radford‐Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Radford‐Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Radford‐Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Radford‐Smith. The network helps show where Daniel Radford‐Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Radford‐Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Radford‐Smith Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Radford‐Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202346
2 202234
3 201826
4 202026
5 202023
6 202314
7 202311
8 201910
9 202310
10 20229
11 20239
12 20228
13 20227
14 20246
15 20225
16 20243
17 20243
18 20233
19 20253
20 20242

About Daniel Radford‐Smith

Daniel Radford‐Smith is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Epidemiology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tryptophan and brain disorders (12 papers), Gut microbiota and health (7 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (6 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (3 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (73 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (25 citations), Physiology (68 citations), Hepatology (16 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (30 citations). Daniel Radford‐Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel C. Anthony, Fay Probert, Philip W. J. Burnet, Elizabeth E. Powell, Lawrie W. Powell, Timothy D. W. Claridge, Abi G. Yates, Nicholas E. Ilott, Jennifer Hebert and Preya Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health, Nutrients, Scientific Reports, Liver International and Journal of Proteome Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact