Daniel Pine

10 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Daniel Pine
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 94
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 91
Replace Imanollah Bigdeli with:
Imanollah Bigdeli Iran
Rebecca E. Kaufman United States
Benjamin Sanford United States
Roman Linz Germany
Melissa R. Weiner United States
Mahur M. Hashemi Netherlands
Bryan D Berthot United States
Rosemarie Krug Germany
Ceren Akdeniz Germany
Kariina Laas Estonia
Daniel Pine relative to Imanollah Bigdeli Iran Imanollah Bigdeli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Imanollah Bigdeli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pine. The network helps show where Daniel Pine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Pine Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Pine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 199966
2 199654
3 200749
4 200146
5 200942
6 199922
7 199621
8 19997
9 19955
10 20201
11 20250

About Daniel Pine

Daniel Pine is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (94 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations). Daniel Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy D. Coplan, José Antônio Baddini Martínez, Lening A. Olivera-Figueroa, Gregory J. Quirk, Devin Mueller, Jack M. Gorman, Donald F. Klein, David R. Shaffer, Gail A. Wasserman and Laurence L. Greenhill. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry and Molecular Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact