Daniel Pine
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 5
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
-
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 1
- Co-authors
- Jeremy D. Coplan (3 shared papers)Jack M. Gorman (1 shared paper)José Antônio Baddini Martínez (2 shared papers)Donald F. Klein (1 shared paper)Gregory J. Quirk (1 shared paper)Lening A. Olivera-Figueroa (1 shared paper)Devin Mueller (1 shared paper)David R. Shaffer (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (2 papers)Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (2 papers)Psychiatry Research (1 paper)Neuropsychopharmacology (1 paper)Molecular Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Daniel Pine
12 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Behavioral Neuroscience 86
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
- Clinical Psychology 108
- Biological Psychiatry 12
- Cognitive Neuroscience 91
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Pine
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Pine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Pine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Pine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Pine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Pine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Pine. The network helps show where Daniel Pine may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Pine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 52 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 |
About Daniel Pine
Daniel Pine is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Hormonal and reproductive studies (1 paper) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (108 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (91 citations). Daniel Pine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy D. Coplan, Jack M. Gorman, José Antônio Baddini Martínez, Donald F. Klein, Gregory J. Quirk, Lening A. Olivera-Figueroa, Devin Mueller, David R. Shaffer, Gail A. Wasserman and Bruce Parsons. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, Psychiatry Research, Neuropsychopharmacology and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.