Ian Rumfitt
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 19
- Philosophy 19
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 4
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Co-authors
- Robert Brandom (1 shared paper)Jeff Malpas (1 shared paper)Susanne Bobzien (1 shared paper)Timothy Williamson (1 shared paper)Bradley Armour‐Garb (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mind (6 papers)Philosophy (3 papers)The Philosophical Review (3 papers)Grazer Philosophische Studien (3 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Ian Rumfitt
32 papers receiving 634 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- History and Philosophy of Science 144
- Philosophy 350
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 387
- Theoretical Computer Science 12
- Artificial Intelligence 238
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Rumfitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Rumfitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Rumfitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Rumfitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Rumfitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Rumfitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Rumfitt. The network helps show where Ian Rumfitt may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Ian Rumfitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 218 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 175 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 49 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 27 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 17 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 5 |
About Ian Rumfitt
Ian Rumfitt is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (144 citations), Philosophy (350 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (387 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (12 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (238 citations). Ian Rumfitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert Brandom, Jeff Malpas, Susanne Bobzien, Timothy Williamson and Bradley Armour‐Garb. Their work appears in journals such as Mind, Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Grazer Philosophische Studien and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.