Daniel McCarthy

732 citations
38 papers · 565 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel McCarthy

35 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Daniel McCarthy
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Atmospheric Science 364
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 123
  • Classics 34
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 108
  • Paleontology 31
Replace John Davidson with:
John Davidson United States
W. Groenman-van Waateringe Netherlands
Dmitry A. Kupriyanov Russia
Shuji Iwata Japan
M.J. Aldrich United States
Michelle A. Chaput Canada
Sergei Yu. Lazarev Netherlands
Herbert Lutz Germany
Karel Van Lerberghe Belgium
Daniel McCarthy relative to John Davidson United States John Davidson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11.2×
John Davidson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel McCarthy. The network helps show where Daniel McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel McCarthy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel McCarthy Line = papers co-authored together Daniel McCarthy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199372
2 201468
3 199557
4 199155
5 199431
6 200530
7 200326
8 198723
9 199223
10 200222
11 199522
12 199318
13 200116
14 199416
15 200111
16 199711
17 20128
18 19977
19 19937
20 19916

About Daniel McCarthy

Daniel McCarthy is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Archeology, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Anthropology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (16 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (10 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (4 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Landslides and related hazards (3 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (364 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (123 citations), Classics (34 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (108 citations) and Paleontology (31 citations). Daniel McCarthy has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Henry Luckman, Daniel J. Smith, Peter E. Kelly, Gerald D. Osborn, Dáibhí Ó Cróinín, Prem Natarajan, Bernhard Suhm, Rohit Prasad, Danny McCarroll and Valeria Nicolosi. Their work appears in journals such as Peritia, Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research, Quaternary Research, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Scripta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact