Countries where authors publish in Quaternary Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaternary Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaternary Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaternary Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaternary Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaternary Research.
About Quaternary Research
The 3.9k papers published in Quaternary Research in the last decades have received a total of 206.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Quaternary Research usually cover Atmospheric Science (3.4k papers), Earth-Surface Processes (995 papers), Paleontology (895 papers), Anthropology (890 papers) and Ecology (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3.3k papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (838 papers), Geological formations and processes (830 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (648 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (550 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (363 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (310 papers) and Climate change and permafrost (256 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaternary Research are Hartmut Heinrich, Stephen C. Porter, Nicholas John Shackleton, Iain Colin Prentice, André Berger, Neil D. Opdyke, James S. Clark, Calvin J. Heusser, Minze Stuiver and Miron L. Heinselman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.