Peter E. Kelly

645 citations
19 papers · 511 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter E. Kelly

19 papers receiving 439 citations

Peers

Peter E. Kelly
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 182
  • Atmospheric Science 164
  • Ecological Modeling 9
  • Global and Planetary Change 66
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 52
Replace Miroslav Šrůtek with:
Miroslav Šrůtek Czechia
James J. Ebersole United States
Jong‐Suk Song South Korea
Uta Matthes Canada
Ruben E. Roos Norway
Reyes Alejano Spain
M R Marvie Mohadjer Iran
Federico M. Schlegel Chile
D. M. Richardson South Africa
Peter J. Marchand United States
Peter E. Kelly relative to Miroslav Šrůtek Czechia Miroslav Šrůtek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.5×
Miroslav Šrůtek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Kelly more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Kelly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Kelly. The network helps show where Peter E. Kelly may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Kelly, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter E. Kelly Line = papers co-authored together Peter E. Kelly links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2000138
2 199159
3 199155
4 199253
5 199440
6 199739
7 199331
8 200428
9 199724
10
The Urban Cliff Revolution: New Findings on the Origins and Evolution of Human Habitats
200417
11 19916
12 19936
13 19954
14 20003
15 19992
16 20002
17
One Health programs at Canadian universities with a veterinary college - 1. The University of Guelph.
20222
18 20001
19
The Last Stand
20071

About Peter E. Kelly

Peter E. Kelly is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Atmospheric Science, Insect Science, Soil Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 19 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tree-ring climate responses (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (2 papers), Forest ecology and management (2 papers), Soil and Environmental Studies (2 papers) and Modern American Literature Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (182 citations), Atmospheric Science (164 citations), Ecological Modeling (9 citations), Global and Planetary Change (66 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (52 citations). Peter E. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Douglas W. Larson, Uta Matthes, Edward R. Cook, Brian Henry Luckman, Daniel McCarthy, U. Matthes‐Sears, Rob J. S. Wilson, Brendan Martin Buckley, Roger H. King and Victoria Nuzzo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Plant Sciences, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Journal of Ecology, Oecologia and Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact