Countries where authors publish in Scripta Materialia
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scripta Materialia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scripta Materialia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scripta Materialia more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scripta Materialia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scripta Materialia.
About Scripta Materialia
The 15.2k papers published in Scripta Materialia in the last decades have received a total of 595.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Scripta Materialia usually cover Metals and Alloys (787 papers), Ceramics and Composites (1.6k papers), Mechanical Engineering (9.3k papers), Materials Chemistry (9.7k papers) and Mechanics of Materials (2.8k papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and mechanical properties (3.1k papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (2.2k papers), Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (1.8k papers), Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties (1.5k papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (1.5k papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (1.5k papers), Advanced materials and composites (1.4k papers) and Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (1.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scripta Materialia are Isao Tanaka, Atsushi Togo, Niels Hansen, Jian‐Feng Nie, K. Hono, K. Lu, Matthew Barnett, Nobuhiro Tsuji, Dierk Raabe and E. Ma.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.