Scripta Materialia

14.9k papers and 552.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 14.9k papers published in Scripta Materialia in the last decades have received a total of 552.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Scripta Materialia usually cover Materials Chemistry (9.6k papers), Mechanical Engineering (9.2k papers) and Mechanics of Materials (2.8k papers) specifically the topics of Microstructure and mechanical properties (3.1k papers), Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties (2.2k papers) and Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scripta Materialia are Isao Tanaka, Atsushi Togo, Niels Hansen, Jian‐Feng Nie, K. Hono, K. Lu, Matthew Barnett, Nobuhiro Tsuji, Terence G. Langdon and E. Ma.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Scripta Materialia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Scripta Materialia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scripta Materialia.

Countries where authors publish in Scripta Materialia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scripta Materialia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scripta Materialia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scripta Materialia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025