Daniel Mauss

1.1k citations
28 papers · 914 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Mauss

27 papers receiving 878 citations

Peers

Daniel Mauss
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 112
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 306
  • General Health Professions 242
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Applied Psychology 22
Replace A. Appels with:
A. Appels Netherlands
Carol A. Dolan United States
Sisitha Udara Jayasinghe Australia
Jean‐Baptiste Bouillon‐Minois France
Jeongok G. Logan United States
Lynn A. Rossy United States
Gérard Lac France
Maya J. Lambiase United States
Susan M. Hedges United States
Lennart Forsman Sweden
Daniel Mauss relative to A. Appels Netherlands A. Appels's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.8×
A. Appels · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Mauss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Mauss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Mauss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Mauss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Mauss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Mauss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Mauss. The network helps show where Daniel Mauss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Mauss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Mauss Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Mauss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013195
2 2014116
3 201271
4 201464
5 201549
6 201241
7 201241
8 201638
9 201538
10 201335
11 201530
12 201829
13 201622
14 201422
15 202121
16 201216
17 201316
18 201611
19 202111
20 20229

About Daniel Mauss

Daniel Mauss is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (13 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (4 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Heart rate and cardiovascular health (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (112 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (306 citations), General Health Professions (242 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations) and Applied Psychology (22 citations). Daniel Mauss has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marc Nicolas Jarczok, Joachim Ernst Fischer, Julian Francis Thayer, Jian Li, Raphael M. Herr, Julian Koenig, Peter Angerer, Burkhard Schmidt, Marion Jarczok and Jos A. Bosch. Their work appears in journals such as Stress, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, International Journal of Cardiology, American Journal of Industrial Medicine and Industrial Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact