Daniël M. Jonker

19 papers receiving 913 citations

Peers

Daniël M. Jonker
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 60
  • Pharmacology 83
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 122
  • Transplantation 20
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 98
Replace Deborah Panebianco with:
Deborah Panebianco United States
Umesh Shukla United States
Sunny Chapel United States
Miriam Saiz‐Rodríguez Spain
Eric Snoeck Belgium
Guillermo Di Girolamo Argentina
Koujirou Yamamoto Japan
Dolores Ochoa Spain
Pablo Zubiaur Spain
Raja Venkatasubramanian United States
Daniël M. Jonker relative to Deborah Panebianco United States Deborah Panebianco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Deborah Panebianco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniël M. Jonker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniël M. Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniël M. Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniël M. Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniël M. Jonker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniël M. Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniël M. Jonker. The network helps show where Daniël M. Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniël M. Jonker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniël M. Jonker Line = papers co-authored together Daniël M. Jonker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007413
2 2002124
3 2004110
4 200574
5 200745
6 201045
7 201133
8 200418
9 199913
10 200311
11 201910
12 200710
13 20039
14 20208
15 20227
16 20213
17 20202
18 20211
19 20241
20 20211

About Daniël M. Jonker

Daniël M. Jonker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Urology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 938 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epilepsy research and treatment (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers) and Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (60 citations), Pharmacology (83 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (122 citations), Transplantation (20 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (98 citations). Daniël M. Jonker has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Mats O. Karlsson, Thomas Kerbusch, Radojka M. Savić, Meindert Danhof, Sandra A. G. Visser, Rob A. Voskuyl, R.A. Voskuyl, Peter M. Edelbroek, Geert J.F. Brekelmans and Gerrit‐Jan de Haan. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, The AAPS Journal, Human Reproduction, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact