Thomas Kerbusch

46 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Thomas Kerbusch
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Pharmacology 359
  • Statistics and Probability 165
  • Health Informatics 24
  • Pharmacology 239
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 239
Replace Richard Peck with:
Richard Peck United Kingdom
Sara L. Van Driest United States
Jogarao Gobburu United States
Thomas M. Polasek Australia
J. Kevin Hicks United States
Yaning Wang United States
Philip E. Empey United States
Daniel Kurnik Israel
Ellen M. McDonagh United States
Bruno Lacarelle France
Thomas Kerbusch relative to Richard Peck United Kingdom Richard Peck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Richard Peck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Kerbusch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Kerbusch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Kerbusch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Kerbusch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Kerbusch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Kerbusch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Kerbusch. The network helps show where Thomas Kerbusch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Kerbusch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Kerbusch Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Kerbusch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007401
2 2015257
3 2001101
4 199992
5 201468
6 199862
7 202060
8 199858
9 200056
10 200950
11 200043
12 200342
13 200039
14 201139
15 201036
16 200131
17 201630
18
Influence of dose and infusion duration on pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and metabolites.
200129
19 200325
20 199825

About Thomas Kerbusch

Thomas Kerbusch is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemotherapy-induced organ toxicity mitigation (16 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (8 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (7 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (6 papers), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (359 citations), Statistics and Probability (165 citations), Health Informatics (24 citations), Pharmacology (239 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (239 citations). Thomas Kerbusch has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mats O. Karlsson, Radojka M. Savić, Daniël M. Jonker, Jos H. Beijnen, Meindert Danhof, Alwin D. R. Huitema, Sandra A. G. Visser, Zereunesay Desta, D. A. Flockhart and H.J. Keizer. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact