Daniel Liebzeit

19 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Daniel Liebzeit
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 85
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 44
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • General Health Professions 134
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 72
Replace Joanne Dollard with:
Joanne Dollard Australia
Deanna Gray‐Miceli United States
Michael Dorevitch Australia
Sue Kurrle Australia
Ericka E. Tung United States
Lucienne A. Reichardt Netherlands
Rosanne van Seben Netherlands
Micaela Jantzi Canada
Elisa Van der Elst Belgium
Cecilie Fromholt Olsen Norway
Daniel Liebzeit relative to Joanne Dollard Australia Joanne Dollard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Joanne Dollard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Liebzeit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Liebzeit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Liebzeit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Liebzeit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Liebzeit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Liebzeit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Liebzeit. The network helps show where Daniel Liebzeit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Liebzeit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Liebzeit Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Liebzeit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201676
2 202147
3 201728
4 201721
5 202117
6 201814
7 201912
8 202010
9 20238
10 20168
11 20198
12 20237
13 20226
14 20224
15 20233
16 20232
17 20211
18 20221
19 20231
20 20250

About Daniel Liebzeit

Daniel Liebzeit is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (13 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (9 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (7 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (2 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (44 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), General Health Professions (134 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (72 citations). Daniel Liebzeit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include Barbara King, Lisa C. Bratzke, Anna Krupp, Kristen E. Pecanac, Jane Mahoney, Beth Fields, Alicia I. Arbaje, Nicole E. Werner, Marie Boltz and Andrea Gilmore‐Bykovskyi. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Nursing Research, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Journal of Aging and Physical Activity and Journal of Applied Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact