Daniel Liebzeit

20 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Daniel Liebzeit
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 48
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 39
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 7
  • General Health Professions 75
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 13
Replace Deanna Gray‐Miceli with:
Deanna Gray‐Miceli United States
Joanne Dollard Australia
Micaela Jantzi Canada
Sue Kurrle Australia
Janet Darby United Kingdom
Shirin Vellani Canada
Kalpana Narayan Shankar United States
Frances Legault Canada
Terrence Nordstrom United States
Margaret Hammersla United States
Daniel Liebzeit relative to Deanna Gray‐Miceli United States Deanna Gray‐Miceli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.2×
Deanna Gray‐Miceli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Liebzeit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Liebzeit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Liebzeit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Liebzeit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Liebzeit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Liebzeit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Liebzeit. The network helps show where Daniel Liebzeit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Liebzeit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Liebzeit Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Liebzeit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201683
2 202156
3 201729
4 201723
5 202119
6 201914
7 201814
8 202012
9 202311
10 202310
11 20198
12 20168
13 20228
14 20226
15 20233
16 20233
17 20232
18 20192
19 20211
20 20251

About Daniel Liebzeit

Daniel Liebzeit is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 24 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (8 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (5 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (2 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (48 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (39 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (7 citations), General Health Professions (75 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (13 citations). Daniel Liebzeit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Lebanon and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Barbara King, Lisa C. Bratzke, Anna E. Krupp, Kristen E. Pecanac, Jane Mahoney, Beth Fields, Alicia I. Arbaje, Nicole E. Werner, Marie P. Boltz and Andrea L Gilmore‐Bykovskyi. Their work appears in journals such as The Gerontologist, Professional Case Management, Nursing Research, Patient Education and Counseling and Journal of Applied Gerontology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact