Beth Fields

61 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

Beth Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 17
  • Occupational Therapy 20
  • General Health Professions 100
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 20
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 6
Replace Leah Macaden with:
Leah Macaden United Kingdom
Nicoletta Aimonino Italy
Frøydis Bruvik Norway
Jenny Larson Sweden
Martinique Perkins United States
Jenny Davison United Kingdom
Harrison G. Bloom United States
Gary Loving United States
Judith Braun United States
Johann M. Vega‐Dienstmaier Peru
Beth Fields relative to Leah Macaden United Kingdom Leah Macaden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Leah Macaden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Fields. The network helps show where Beth Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Fields Line = papers co-authored together Beth Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202151
2 201846
3 201939
4 201829
5 201728
6 202119
7 202119
8 201916
9 202216
10 201914
11 202013
12 201912
13 201810
14 20217
15 20246
16 20226
17 20216
18 20226
19 20236
20 20215

About Beth Fields

Beth Fields is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, having authored 76 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (14 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (11 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (17 citations), Occupational Therapy (20 citations), General Health Professions (100 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (20 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (6 citations). Beth Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Wood, Juleen Rodakowski, A. Everette James, Daniel Liebzeit, Scott R. Beach, Nicole E. Werner, Stacy Smallfield, Alicia I. Arbaje, Michelle Rose and Merinda McLure. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Innovation in Aging, The Gerontologist, Disability and Rehabilitation and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact