Daniel L. Wolf
Impact in
-
- Spinal Cord Injury Research
- Hepatology top 10%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Papers in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 5
- Surgery 6
- Co-authors
- Edward D. Hall (4 shared papers)J. Scott Mohrland (7 shared papers)John S. Althaus (1 shared paper)J. Alberto San Román (4 shared papers)Isidre Vilacosta (4 shared papers)Javier López (4 shared papers)Ana Revilla (4 shared papers)Cristina Sarriá (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer (2 papers)Neuropharmacology (2 papers)Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) (2 papers)Experimental Neurology (1 paper)International Journal of Cardiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainMexico
In The Last Decade
Daniel L. Wolf
25 papers receiving 728 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 229
- Hepatology 66
- Emergency Medicine 62
- Oncology 165
- Infectious Diseases 108
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Wolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Wolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Wolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Wolf. The network helps show where Daniel L. Wolf may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 176 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 162 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 71 | |
| 4 | 1987 | 66 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 37 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1984 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 4 |
About Daniel L. Wolf
Daniel L. Wolf is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Physiology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (4 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (4 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (3 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (229 citations), Hepatology (66 citations), Emergency Medicine (62 citations), Oncology (165 citations) and Infectious Diseases (108 citations). Daniel L. Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Edward D. Hall, J. Scott Mohrland, John S. Althaus, J. Alberto San Román, Isidre Vilacosta, Javier López, Ana Revilla, Cristina Sarriá, Charles E. Geyer and Richard Pazdur. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Neuropharmacology, Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), Experimental Neurology and International Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.