Daniel L. Horowitz

36 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

Daniel L. Horowitz
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 32
  • Marketing 121
  • Museology 43
  • Music 24
  • Gender Studies 60
Replace Rosalind Williams with:
Rosalind Williams United States
Cindy Sondik Aron United States
Gunther Barth United States
Stephen R. Fox United States
Jennifer Craik Australia
Susan Gray Davis United States
Stephen D. Papson United States
Robert W. Rydell United States
Andrea Davies United Kingdom
KATHLEEN M. ADAMS United States
Daniel L. Horowitz relative to Rosalind Williams United States Rosalind Williams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Rosalind Williams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel L. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel L. Horowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel L. Horowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel L. Horowitz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel L. Horowitz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel L. Horowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel L. Horowitz. The network helps show where Daniel L. Horowitz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel L. Horowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel L. Horowitz Line = papers co-authored together Daniel L. Horowitz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006191
2 1999132
3 1986116
4
The Israeli Army
197548
5 198625
6 199925
7
Vance Packard & American social criticism
199422
8 199220
9 199620
10 196318
11 199918
12 196416
13 198915
14 198914
15 198612
16 201212
17 197411
18 200511
19 199810
20 198510

About Daniel L. Horowitz

Daniel L. Horowitz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Political Science and International Relations, Biophysics and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 48 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (5 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (2 papers), Intelligence, Security, War Strategy (2 papers) and American Political and Social Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (32 citations), Marketing (121 citations), Museology (43 citations), Music (24 citations) and Gender Studies (60 citations). Daniel L. Horowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Walker Laird, Winifred D. Wandersee, Edward Nicolae Luttwak, Sergey E. Ilyin, Karl Yoder, Tanya S. Kanigan, James Hurley, Tom B. Morrison, Colin J. H. Brenan and Roland Marchand. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journal of American History, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, American Quarterly and The New England Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact