Daniel Klement

22 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Daniel Klement
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 148
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 170
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 181
  • Computer Science Applications 54
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
Replace Neha U. Keshav with:
Neha U. Keshav United States
Kacy Redd United States
Robert L. Dunbar United States
Orit Furman Israel
Jing Fang China
Elise Demeter United States
Rachel C. Lazarus United States
Robert E. Kemm Australia
David Meder Denmark
Zhenghan Qi United States
Daniel Klement relative to Neha U. Keshav United States Neha U. Keshav's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Neha U. Keshav · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Klement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Klement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Klement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Klement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Klement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Klement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Klement. The network helps show where Daniel Klement may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Klement, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Klement Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Klement links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011153
2 200683
3 199647
4 200646
5 201728
6 200525
7 200614
8 201514
9 201012
10 200011
11 201210
12 19979
13 20087
14 20097
15 20096
16 20195
17 20145
18 20125
19 20094
20 20124

About Daniel Klement

Daniel Klement is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sensory Systems and Cell Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 501 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (10 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (148 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (170 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Computer Science Applications (54 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (18 citations). Daniel Klement has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cyril Brom, André A. Fenton, Andrey V. Olypher, Tereza Nekovářová, Aleš Stuchlı́k, Karel Valeš, Vĕra Bubeníková‐Valešová, S. Rammos, Eva Pastalkova and Rüdiger von Kries. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Physiological Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Hippocampus and Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact