Viktor Beneš

803 citations
71 papers · 491 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Viktor Beneš

60 papers receiving 474 citations

Peers

Viktor Beneš
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Statistics and Probability 83
  • Applied Mathematics 102
  • Finance 70
  • Management Science and Operations Research 55
  • Geometry and Topology 38
Replace Fanchao Kong with:
Fanchao Kong China
John E. Lavery United States
Long Feng China
Eduardo Mendes France
Yannan Sun United States
Aleksey V. Nenarokomov Russia
Angel Urbina United States
Abderrahmane Habbal France
Xiaohan Wei China
Viktor Beneš relative to Fanchao Kong China Fanchao Kong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Fanchao Kong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Viktor Beneš

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Viktor Beneš's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Viktor Beneš with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Viktor Beneš more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Viktor Beneš

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Viktor Beneš. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Viktor Beneš. The network helps show where Viktor Beneš may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Viktor Beneš, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Viktor Beneš Line = papers co-authored together Viktor Beneš links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997103
2 201643
3 200638
4 200428
5 198027
6 201625
7 201117
8 199716
9 201912
10 201012
11
Planar anisotropy revisited.
200011
12 201911
13 20209
14 19988
15 20118
16 20137
17 20207
18 20246
19 20036
20
Application of log Gaussian Cox processes in disease mapping
20036

About Viktor Beneš

Viktor Beneš is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Statistics and Probability, Artificial Intelligence and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 71 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Point processes and geometric inequalities (29 papers), Morphological variations and asymmetry (10 papers), Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (6 papers), Microstructure and mechanical properties (5 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (4 papers), Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties (4 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (4 papers) and Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (83 citations), Applied Mathematics (102 citations), Finance (70 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (55 citations) and Geometry and Topology (38 citations). Viktor Beneš has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pavel Ctibor, Volker Schmidt, René Boel, Jan Rataj, A.M. Gokhale, Omar Pecho, Matthias Neumann, Lorenz Holzer, Jesper Møller and Miroslav Svítek. Their work appears in journals such as Image Analysis & Stereology, Kybernetika, Materials Characterization, Journal of Microscopy and Advances in Applied Probability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact