Daniel Kim

165.9k citations
153 papers · 5.3k · h-index 38

Impact in

  • Health top 0.2%
    • Health disparities and outcomes
    • Employment and Welfare Studies
    • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
    • Homelessness and Social Issues

Papers in

Daniel Kim

136 papers receiving 5.1k citations

Peers

Daniel Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Health 1.6k
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Applied Psychology 171
  • Transportation 216
  • Clinical Psychology 678
Replace Amanda Sacker with:
Amanda Sacker United Kingdom
Jennifer B. Dowd United States
Mauricio Avendaño United Kingdom
Ajay Tandon United States
Anne Kavanagh Australia
Stéphanie Robert United States
Frederick J. Zimmerman United States
William A. Satariano United States
Jason M. Fletcher United States
Ulla Christensen Denmark
Daniel Kim relative to Amanda Sacker United Kingdom Amanda Sacker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Amanda Sacker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Kim. The network helps show where Daniel Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Kim Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007373
2 2008305
3 2006284
4 2005247
5 2010246
6 2004235
7 2013224
8 2006177
9 2005159
10 2006151
11 2015146
12 2021132
13 2008124
14 2016104
15 200699
16 200197
17 201193
18 200791
19 201390
20 201689

About Daniel Kim

Daniel Kim is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 153 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (33 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (10 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (9 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (4 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.6k citations), General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Applied Psychology (171 citations), Transportation (216 citations) and Clinical Psychology (678 citations). Daniel Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Ichiro Kawachi, S. V. Subramanian, S. V. Subramanian, Adrianna Saada, Ichiro Kawachi, Ichiro Kawachi, Laura E. Levine, Marc N. Potenza, Jon E. Grant and Steven L. Gortmaker. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Medicine, Social Science & Medicine, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact