Daniel Jung

2.4k citations
67 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Jung

64 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Daniel Jung
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Internal Medicine 134
  • Rehabilitation 146
  • Aging 35
  • Molecular Biology 1.3k
  • Physiology 471
Replace Andrew Dunbar with:
Andrew Dunbar United States
Kousuke Marutsuka Japan
Primož Rožman Slovenia
Lynn M. Butler Sweden
Ewan A. Langan Germany
Anders Tengblad Sweden
Sanjiv Manek United Kingdom
Schwartz Sm United States
Keiichi Isaka Japan
Bárbara Hermes Germany
Daniel Jung relative to Andrew Dunbar United States Andrew Dunbar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.4×
Andrew Dunbar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Jung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Jung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Jung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Jung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Jung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Jung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Jung. The network helps show where Daniel Jung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Jung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Jung Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Jung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995283
2 1995228
3 1996161
4 2000138
5 1995112
6 199787
7 199676
8 201151
9 200950
10 199646
11 201244
12 199339
13 199338
14 201237
15 201837
16 199134
17 201831
18 199729
19 200228
20 201225

About Daniel Jung

Daniel Jung is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Health, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (13 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (11 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers), Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (6 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (6 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (134 citations), Rehabilitation (146 citations), Aging (35 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations) and Physiology (471 citations). Daniel Jung has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Kevin P. Campbell, Bin Yang, Jeffrey S. Chamberlain, Jon Meyer, Jill A. Rafael, David G. Motto, Gary A. Koretzky, Imshik Lee, Kyung Bin Song and Kathleen Corrado. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Journal of Immunological Methods, Annals of Vascular Surgery and Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact