Daniel Joyce
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Motor Control and Adaptation
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Neurology top 10%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
- Free Will and Agency 1
-
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior 2
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Sukhwinder S. Shergill (8 shared papers)Thomas P. White (2 shared papers)Daniel M. Wolpert (2 shared papers)Chris Frith (2 shared papers)Paul M. Bays (2 shared papers)Derek K. Tracy (5 shared papers)Owen O’Daly (4 shared papers)Robin Murray (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Neuropsychologia (1 paper)Journal of Psychopharmacology (1 paper)Translational Psychiatry (1 paper)Brain stimulation (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel Joyce
9 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 221
- Neurology 68
- Psychiatry and Mental health 103
- Biological Psychiatry 9
- Social Psychology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Joyce
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Joyce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Joyce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Joyce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Joyce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Joyce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Joyce. The network helps show where Daniel Joyce may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Joyce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 53 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 10 | Laboratory experiments suitable for practical classes in psychopharmacology. | 1970 | 1 |
About Daniel Joyce
Daniel Joyce is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Pharmacology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Treatment of Major Depression (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (221 citations), Neurology (68 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (103 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Social Psychology (62 citations). Daniel Joyce has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sukhwinder S. Shergill, Thomas P. White, Daniel M. Wolpert, Chris Frith, Paul M. Bays, Derek K. Tracy, Owen O’Daly, Robin Murray, Klaas Ε. Stephan and John Hodsoll. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychologia, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Translational Psychiatry, Brain stimulation and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.