F. Häger
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 6
- Neuroscience and Music Perception 4
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 2
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 1
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 2
- Co-authors
- Hans‐Peter Volz (10 shared papers)Christian Gaser (9 shared papers)Heinrich Sauer (10 shared papers)Igor Nenadić (4 shared papers)Thomas Rammsayer (3 shared papers)Hans‐Joachim Mentzel (6 shared papers)R. Rzanny (5 shared papers)Ilonka Kreitschmann‐Andermahr (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Schizophrenia Research (3 papers)Neuroreport (1 paper)Clinical Journal of Pain (1 paper)European Psychiatry (1 paper)Experimental Brain Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Germany
In The Last Decade
F. Häger
11 papers receiving 538 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Cognitive Neuroscience 405
- Psychiatry and Mental health 131
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
- Music 19
- Biological Psychiatry 9
Countries citing papers authored by F. Häger
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Häger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Häger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Häger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Häger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Häger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Häger. The network helps show where F. Häger may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside F. Häger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 178 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 107 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 99 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 95 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 1 |
About F. Häger
F. Häger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (1 paper), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper) and Dermatological diseases and infestations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (405 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (83 citations), Music (19 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (9 citations). F. Häger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Peter Volz, Christian Gaser, Heinrich Sauer, Igor Nenadić, Thomas Rammsayer, Hans‐Joachim Mentzel, R. Rzanny, Ilonka Kreitschmann‐Andermahr, Werner A. Kaiser and W. A. Kaiser. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Neuroreport, Clinical Journal of Pain, European Psychiatry and Experimental Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.