Ann Moss
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Frederick Ahl (1 shared paper)Richard Waswo (1 shared paper)François Rigolot (2 shared papers)John O. Ward (1 shared paper)Robert Griffin (1 shared paper)Debora Shuger (1 shared paper)Christopher Braider (1 shared paper)William J. Kennedy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (4 papers)Journal of the History of Ideas (2 papers)Phi Delta Kappan (1 paper)Comparative Literature (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ann Moss
18 papers receiving 366 citations
Ann Moss's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Classics 212
- History 266
- Literature and Literary Theory 210
- Anthropology 142
- History and Philosophy of Science 51
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Moss
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Moss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Moss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Moss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Moss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Moss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Moss. The network helps show where Ann Moss may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Ann Moss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought Hit paper breakdown → | 1996 | 272 |
| 2 | 1985 | 60 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 48 | |
| 5 | 1989 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 36 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 15 | Acta Conventus Neo-Latini Hafniensis : proceedings of the Eighth International Congress of Neo-Latin Studies, Copenhagen, 12 August to 17 August 1991 | 1994 | 1 |
| 16 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1999 | 1 |
About Ann Moss
Ann Moss is a scholar working on Classics, History, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 29 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (14 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (7 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (4 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (212 citations), History (266 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (210 citations), Anthropology (142 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (51 citations). Ann Moss has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Frederick Ahl, Richard Waswo, François Rigolot, John O. Ward, Robert Griffin, Debora Shuger, Christopher Braider, William J. Kennedy, Nicholas Cronk and Roland Greene. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Journal of the History of Ideas, Phi Delta Kappan, Comparative Literature and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.