International Journal of the Classical Tradition

1.2k citations
444 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies

Papers in

    • Byzantine Studies and History 38
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 26
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 71
    • Historical and Literary Studies 28

International Journal of the Classical Tradition

215 papers receiving 663 citations

Peers

International Journal of the Classical Tradition
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Classics 277
  • Anthropology 546
  • Archeology 297
  • Philosophy 265
  • History 233
Replace Antike und Abendland with:
Antike und Abendland Germany
Journal of Arabic Literature United States
Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada Canada
Rheinisches Museum für Philologie Ukraine
Journal of Early Modern History United States
Parergon Australia
Hermes Germany
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies United States
Classical Receptions Journal United States
Jewish History United States
International Journal of the Classical Tradition relative to Antike und Abendland Germany Antike und Abendland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Antike und Abendland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of the Classical Tradition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of the Classical Tradition more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition.

About International Journal of the Classical Tradition

The 444 papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition usually cover Classics (89 papers), Anthropology (109 papers), History (90 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (84 papers) and Religious studies (28 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (71 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (38 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (35 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (28 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (28 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (27 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (27 papers) and Renaissance Literature and Culture (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of the Classical Tradition are David Pingree, Theodore Ziolkowski, Paul Allen Miller, Ilaria Ramelli, Charles Fantazzi, Iiro Kajanto, Helen King, Aldo Setaioli, Jaś Elsner and Edith Hall.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact