International Journal of the Classical Tradition

1.2k citations
416 papers · · active since 1994

Impact in

  • Classics top 10%
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History
  • Anthropology top 10%
    • Classical Antiquity Studies

Papers in

    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 73
    • Medieval Literature and History 17
    • Classical Antiquity Studies 189

International Journal of the Classical Tradition

243 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

International Journal of the Classical Tradition
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Classics 194
  • Anthropology 416
  • Philosophy 188
  • Language and Linguistics 165
  • Literature and Literary Theory 202
Replace Journal of Early Modern History with:
Journal of Early Modern History United States
Journal of modern Greek studies United States
Arethusa United States
T oung Pao United States
Antike und Abendland Germany
Scandinavian Studies United States
Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici United States
Mouseion Journal of the Classical Association of Canada Canada
Italian Studies United Kingdom
Ramus United States
International Journal of the Classical Tradition relative to Journal of Early Modern History United States Journal of Early Modern History's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
Journal of Early Modern History · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of the Classical Tradition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of the Classical Tradition more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition.

About International Journal of the Classical Tradition

The 416 papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition in the last decades have received a total of 1.2k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of the Classical Tradition usually cover Classics (98 papers), Anthropology (190 papers), Language and Linguistics (129 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (100 papers) and History (90 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (189 papers), Classical Studies and Philology (119 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (73 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (54 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (49 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (27 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (20 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (17 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of the Classical Tradition are David Edwin Pingree, Theodore J. Ziolkowski, Paul Allen Miller, Ilaria L. E. Ramelli, Helen King, Iiro Kajanto, Charles E. Fantazzi, Edith Hall, Aldo Setaioli and Peter E. Pormann.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact