Daniel J. O’Donovan

28 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Daniel J. O’Donovan
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Clinical Biochemistry 42
  • Physiology 24
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 77
  • Molecular Biology 250
  • Nephrology 21
Replace Craig C. Freudenrich with:
Craig C. Freudenrich United States
Tadashi Kashiwagura Japan
Henry J. Tsai Taiwan
C. Pietrzyk Germany
Bruce L. Maloff United States
Michael T. Shoemaker United States
Frederick B. Loiselle Canada
M V Riley United States
J. Sandmann Germany
Cristina Fenollar‐Ferrer United States
Daniel J. O’Donovan relative to Craig C. Freudenrich United States Craig C. Freudenrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×23×
Craig C. Freudenrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. O’Donovan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. O’Donovan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. O’Donovan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. O’Donovan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. O’Donovan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. O’Donovan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. O’Donovan. The network helps show where Daniel J. O’Donovan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. O’Donovan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. O’Donovan Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. O’Donovan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201374
2 199965
3 197658
4 201249
5 196636
6 197128
7 198018
8 201216
9 197814
10 198010
11
Factors affecting the deamidation of glutamine by kidney mitochondria of normal and acidotic rats.
19689
12 19808
13 19757
14 19797
15 19706
16 20244
17 20234
18 19754
19 20223
20 19983

About Daniel J. O’Donovan

Daniel J. O’Donovan is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, Nephrology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (10 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (4 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (3 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (3 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (42 citations), Physiology (24 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (77 citations), Molecular Biology (250 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). Daniel J. O’Donovan has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julia Logan, William D. Lotspeich, Anthony Watson, Ciarán MacDonncha, Piotr Sliz, Yunsun Nam, Stephen C. Blacklow, Thomas E. Wales, John R. Engen and B. E. Leonard. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Biochemical Society Transactions, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Metabolism and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact