Daniel J. Leab
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
- Labor Movements and Unions
- Communication top 10%
- Media Studies and Communication
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 5
- Italian Fascism and Post-war Society 3
- Digital Games and Media 2
-
- Cinema and Media Studies 11
- Co-authors
- Bonnie Brennen (1 shared paper)Hanno Hardt (1 shared paper)Daniel Bernardi (1 shared paper)Hugh Hawkins (1 shared paper)Richard J. Meister (1 shared paper)Seymour Martin Lipset (1 shared paper)Sidney Fine (1 shared paper)David Riesman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of American History (8 papers)Political Science Quarterly (6 papers)Labor History (5 papers)The New England Quarterly (3 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Daniel J. Leab
33 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Public Administration 38
- Communication 73
- Music 19
- Gender Studies 49
- Literature and Literary Theory 54
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Leab
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Leab's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Leab with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Leab more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Leab
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Leab. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Leab. The network helps show where Daniel J. Leab may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Leab, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1996 | 75 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 48 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 47 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 38 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 33 | |
| 6 | 1976 | 21 | |
| 7 | 1971 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1975 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1967 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 12 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1971 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1984 | 7 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1975 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1976 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 20 | THE MEMORIAL DAY MASSACRE | 1967 | 4 |
About Daniel J. Leab
Daniel J. Leab is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Marketing and History, having authored 44 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cinema and Media Studies (11 papers), European history and politics (6 papers), Race, History, and American Society (5 papers), American History and Culture (4 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Digital Games and Media (2 papers) and Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (38 citations), Communication (73 citations), Music (19 citations), Gender Studies (49 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations). Daniel J. Leab has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bonnie Brennen, Hanno Hardt, Daniel Bernardi, Hugh Hawkins, Richard J. Meister, Seymour Martin Lipset, Sidney Fine, David Riesman, Immanuel Wallerstein and Paul Starr. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, Political Science Quarterly, Labor History, The New England Quarterly and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.