Daniel J. Lacey

563 citations
22 papers · 413 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Lacey

21 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Lacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 162
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 94
  • Clinical Biochemistry 35
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 95
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
Replace Francesc Sanmartí with:
Francesc Sanmartí Spain
M. Harold Fogelson United States
Yoshio Morimatsu Japan
Gunnar Sanner Sweden
Takehiko Morimoto Japan
Dario Pruna Italy
M. C. Maheshwari India
Grétar Guðmundsson Iceland
Myers Re United States
I Lagenstein Germany
Daniel J. Lacey relative to Francesc Sanmartí Spain Francesc Sanmartí's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Francesc Sanmartí · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Lacey. The network helps show where Daniel J. Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Lacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Lacey Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Lacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198650
2 198648
3 198347
4 197843
5 198539
6 198232
7 198423
8 198123
9 198621
10 201217
11 198513
12 198712
13 19848
14 19868
15 19866
16 19866
17 19855
18 19835
19 19713
20 19742

About Daniel J. Lacey

Daniel J. Lacey is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 22 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (5 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (162 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (94 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (35 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (95 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations). Daniel J. Lacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kornel Terplan, Robert E. Kaplan, John M. Opitz, Samuel J. Horwitz, Herbert E. Gilmore, Patricia K. Duffner, William Singer, Michael E. Cohen, Reid R. Heffner and Adrienne Stolfi. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, The Journal of Pediatrics, Pediatric Neurology, Brain Research and Annals of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact