Daniel J. Hicks

528 citations
26 papers · 273 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel J. Hicks

25 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Daniel J. Hicks
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • History and Philosophy of Science 62
  • Philosophy 58
  • General Psychology 5
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 25
  • Information Systems and Management 23
Replace Barton Moffatt with:
Barton Moffatt United States
Brian Bàlmer United Kingdom
André Juthe Netherlands
Cliff Hooker Australia
Elizabeth L. Pier United States
Carl Friedrich Gethmann Germany
Martina Franzen Germany
Francis Chateauraynaud France
Theiss Bendixen Denmark
Kristin Hoffmann Canada
Daniel J. Hicks relative to Barton Moffatt United States Barton Moffatt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
Barton Moffatt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel J. Hicks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel J. Hicks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel J. Hicks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel J. Hicks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel J. Hicks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel J. Hicks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel J. Hicks. The network helps show where Daniel J. Hicks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel J. Hicks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel J. Hicks Line = papers co-authored together Daniel J. Hicks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201462
2 201627
3 202125
4 201922
5 201020
6 201817
7 201514
8 201811
9 202210
10 20199
11 20199
12 20177
13 20197
14 20177
15 20206
16 20164
17 20223
18 20223
19 20212
20 20152

About Daniel J. Hicks

Daniel J. Hicks is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change Communication and Perception (7 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (7 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (62 citations), Philosophy (58 citations), General Psychology (5 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (25 citations) and Information Systems and Management (23 citations). Daniel J. Hicks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Stapleford, Manuela Fernández Pinto, Emilio J. C. Lobato, MacKenzie Smith, Reid Simmons, Jessey Wright, P. D. Magnus, David A. Coil, Jonathan A. Eisen and Carolyn Dicey Jennings. Their work appears in journals such as Quantitative Science Studies, Philosophy of Science, PLoS ONE, Synthese and Teaching Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact