Cliff Hooker

18 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Cliff Hooker
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • History and Philosophy of Science 42
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
  • Management Science and Operations Research 35
  • Information Systems and Management 19
  • Architecture 4
Replace Val Dusek with:
Val Dusek United States
John Cullars United States
P. van Andel Netherlands
Michael Macdonald‐Ross United Kingdom
Arend Jan Waarlo Netherlands
Sjoerd D. Zwart Netherlands
Roald P. Verhoeff Netherlands
Fernando Secomandi Netherlands
Elizabeth L. Pier United States
Nicole LaDue United States
Cliff Hooker relative to Val Dusek United States Val Dusek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Val Dusek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cliff Hooker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cliff Hooker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cliff Hooker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cliff Hooker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cliff Hooker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cliff Hooker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cliff Hooker. The network helps show where Cliff Hooker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Cliff Hooker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cliff Hooker Line = papers co-authored together Cliff Hooker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2013100
2 201237
3 201224
4 200922
5 201014
6 201513
7 201311
8 20149
9 20188
10 20137
11 19794
12 20164
13 20174
14 20033
15 20183
16 19842
17 20182
18 20181
19
Re-Reasoning Ethics: The Rationality of Deliberation and Judgment in Ethics
20181
20 20130

About Cliff Hooker

Cliff Hooker is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Management Science and Operations Research, Mechanical Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (5 papers), Design Education and Practice (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (1 paper), Product Development and Customization (1 paper) and Plant and animal studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (35 citations), Information Systems and Management (19 citations) and Architecture (4 citations). Cliff Hooker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Robert Farrell, Barry Hoffmaster, Giles Hooker, Ian E. Alexander, Ian Kerridge and Claire T. Deakin. Their work appears in journals such as Design Studies, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, Axiomathes, Philosophy of Science and Foundations of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact