Daniel I. Galper

18 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Daniel I. Galper
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Biological Psychiatry 53
  • Applied Psychology 88
  • Clinical Psychology 351
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 45
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 78
Replace Krista A. Barbour with:
Krista A. Barbour United States
Teri T. Baldewicz United States
Patricia A. Kinser United States
Garcia Ashdown‐Franks Canada
Cynthia L. Battle United States
Bettina K. Doering Germany
Aaron Kandola United Kingdom
Ben Whalley United Kingdom
I‐Mei Lin Taiwan
Julia Anna Glombiewski Germany
Daniel I. Galper relative to Krista A. Barbour United States Krista A. Barbour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Krista A. Barbour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel I. Galper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel I. Galper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel I. Galper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel I. Galper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel I. Galper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel I. Galper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel I. Galper. The network helps show where Daniel I. Galper may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel I. Galper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel I. Galper Line = papers co-authored together Daniel I. Galper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2005311
2 2012183
3 2011174
4 2010172
5 201466
6 201664
7 200660
8 200341
9 199937
10 201129
11 199716
12 20039
13 20038
14 19937
15 19964
16 19973
17 20022
18 19961

About Daniel I. Galper

Daniel I. Galper is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Physiology, Health, Social Psychology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers), Physical Activity and Health (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (53 citations), Applied Psychology (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (351 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (78 citations). Daniel I. Galper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Madhukar H. Trivedi, Andrea L. Dunn, Lynn F. Bufka, Carolyn E. Barlow, James B. Kampert, Abere Sawaqdeh, Nabil Hassan El-Ghoroury, Ann Gill Taylor, Kim E. Innes and Lisa E. Goehler. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Journal of Health Psychology, Clinical Trials and Applied and Preventive Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact