Daniel Höschen

28 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

Daniel Höschen
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 663
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 43
  • Materials Chemistry 101
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 21
  • Aerospace Engineering 16
Replace P. J. Traverso with:
P. J. Traverso Germany
Guruparan Satheeswaran Germany
D. Böckenhoff Germany
Ralph Laube Germany
T. Ngo Germany
B. Shanahan Germany
K.P. Hollfeld Germany
Christoph Slaby Germany
Marko Blatzheim Germany
Ben Israeli Germany
Daniel Höschen relative to P. J. Traverso Germany P. J. Traverso's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
P. J. Traverso · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Höschen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Höschen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Höschen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Höschen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Höschen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Höschen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Höschen. The network helps show where Daniel Höschen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Höschen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Höschen Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Höschen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019211
2 2017158
3 2021142
4 202149
5 201725
6 202424
7 201720
8 201918
9 202118
10 201816
11 201914
12 202014
13 201812
14 201911
15 202111
16 20188
17 20186
18 20184
19 20194
20 20194

About Daniel Höschen

Daniel Höschen is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Computational Mechanics, Control and Systems Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 28 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (22 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (2 papers), Teleoperation and Haptic Systems (1 paper), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (1 paper) and Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (663 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (43 citations), Materials Chemistry (101 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (21 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (16 citations). Daniel Höschen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Søren Pape Møller, Ch. Linsmeier, Guntram Czymek, Olaf Neubauer, Ning Yan, S. Bozhenkov, Sebastijan Brezinsek, D. Nicolai, D. Hathiramani and Ralf König. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Fusion, Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Materials and Energy, Review of Scientific Instruments and Physics of Plasmas.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact