Daniel Greco

1.2k citations
23 papers · 530 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Greco

23 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Daniel Greco
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Philosophy 398
  • History and Philosophy of Science 85
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 182
  • General Decision Sciences 14
Replace Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio with:
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland
Juan Comesaña United States
Julia Staffel United States
Patrick Rysiew Canada
Steven D. Hales United States
Michael G. Titelbaum United States
Ram Neta United States
Andrew Arana United States
Christopher J. G. Meacham United States
Jonathan Weisberg Canada
Daniel Greco relative to Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Greco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Greco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Greco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Greco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Greco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Greco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Greco. The network helps show where Daniel Greco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Greco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Greco Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Greco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Phase Maps Filtering Methods in Dixon Technique on Dedicated Low Field Scanners
2012100
2 201272
3 201564
4 201660
5 201459
6 201447
7 201621
8 201920
9 201614
10 201513
11 201213
12 201510
13 20236
14
Verbal Debates in Epistemology
20155
15 20155
16 20064
17 20193
18 20193
19 20143
20 20113

About Daniel Greco

Daniel Greco is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 23 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (4 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and Thermal Analysis in Power Transmission (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (398 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (85 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations) and General Decision Sciences (14 citations). Daniel Greco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Frequent co-authors include Brian Hedden, Davide Caramella, Gaetano Giunta, Évelyne Aubry, Philippe Blanc, G. M. Beskin, С. Карпов, S. Bondar, A. Piccioni and C. Bartolini. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy Compass and Journal of Sound and Vibration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact