Daniel Greco

1.3k citations
30 papers · 660 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Greco

28 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers

Daniel Greco
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Philosophy 505
  • History and Philosophy of Science 117
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 245
  • General Decision Sciences 25
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 211
Replace Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio with:
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland
Patrick Rysiew Canada
Sophie Horowitz United States
Julia Staffel United States
Juan Comesaña United States
Susanna Rinard United States
Ram Neta United States
Daniel Rothschild United Kingdom
Andrew Arana United States
Abrol Fairweather United States
Daniel Greco relative to Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Finland Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Greco

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Greco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Greco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Greco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Greco

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Greco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Greco. The network helps show where Daniel Greco may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Greco, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Greco Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Greco links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Phase Maps Filtering Methods in Dixon Technique on Dedicated Low Field Scanners
2012100
2 201285
3 201581
4 201676
5 201463
6 201453
7 201629
8 201926
9 201324
10 201619
11 201216
12 201514
13 202312
14 201512
15 20198
16 20155
17
Verbal Debates in Epistemology
20155
18 20215
19 20194
20 20064

About Daniel Greco

Daniel Greco is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 30 papers that have together received 660 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (10 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (505 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (117 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (245 citations), General Decision Sciences (25 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (211 citations). Daniel Greco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Brian Hedden, Davide Caramella, Gaetano Giunta, Évelyne Aubry, Philippe Blanc, C. Bartolini, A. Piccioni, S. Bondar, А. Гуарниери and G. M. Beskin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy Compass, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Journal of Sound and Vibration.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact