Brian Hedden

1.2k citations
26 papers · 497 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Hedden

22 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers

Brian Hedden
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • General Decision Sciences 65
  • Philosophy 344
  • History and Philosophy of Science 79
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 150
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 195
Replace Jordan Howard Sobel with:
Jordan Howard Sobel Canada
Rachael Briggs United States
James Dreier United States
Michael G. Titelbaum United States
Erik Carlson Sweden
Daniel Rothschild United Kingdom
Elijah Millgram United States
Moti Mizrahi United States
Mikkel Gerken Denmark
Christoph Kelp Belgium
Brian Hedden relative to Jordan Howard Sobel Canada Jordan Howard Sobel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Jordan Howard Sobel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Hedden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Hedden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Hedden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Hedden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Hedden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Hedden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Hedden. The network helps show where Brian Hedden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Brian Hedden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Hedden Line = papers co-authored together Brian Hedden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202173
2 201660
3 201559
4 201557
5 201536
6 201235
7 201332
8 201523
9 201923
10 201820
11 202015
12 201812
13 201112
14 201512
15 20168
16 20176
17 20235
18 20233
19 20232
20 20172

About Brian Hedden

Brian Hedden is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Safety Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (18 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (65 citations), Philosophy (344 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (79 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (150 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (195 citations). Brian Hedden has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Greco, Mark Colyvan, Caspar Hare, Kevin Dorst, Mario I. Romero‐Ortega, Philippe E. Zimmern, Ana G. Hernández-Reynoso, Margarita Martı́nez–Gómez and Francisco Castelán. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis, Mind, Noûs and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact