Jonathan Weisberg
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
Papers in
-
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 8
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
-
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 3
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher J. G. Meacham (1 shared paper)Richard Pettigrew (3 shared papers)Johanna Thoma (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (4 papers)Philosophical Studies (3 papers)Analysis (2 papers)Journal of Philosophical Logic (1 paper)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Weisberg
15 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- History and Philosophy of Science 142
- Philosophy 272
- General Decision Sciences 44
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 143
- Cognitive Neuroscience 86
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Weisberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Weisberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Weisberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Weisberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Weisberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Weisberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Weisberg. The network helps show where Jonathan Weisberg may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Weisberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 49 | |
| 4 | The Open Handbook of Formal Epistemology | 2019 | 42 |
| 5 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 14 | Dempster-Shafer Theory | 2010 | 2 |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 0 |
About Jonathan Weisberg
Jonathan Weisberg is a scholar working on Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and General Decision Sciences, having authored 17 papers that have together received 371 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (3 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (142 citations), Philosophy (272 citations), General Decision Sciences (44 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (143 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (86 citations). Jonathan Weisberg has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. G. Meacham, Richard Pettigrew and Johanna Thoma. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Philosophical Studies, Analysis, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.