Daniel Feiler

16 papers receiving 452 citations

Peers

Daniel Feiler
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • General Decision Sciences 57
  • Marketing 87
  • Management Information Systems 81
  • Management Science and Operations Research 106
  • Applied Psychology 34
Replace Kelly E. See with:
Kelly E. See United States
Danny Weathers United States
Stacey Whitecotton United States
Wen‐Hsien Huang Taiwan
Reinhard Kunz Germany
Sujay Dutta United States
Kenneth M. York United States
I. Robert Andrews Canada
Marc Vanhuele France
Eike B. Kroll Germany
Daniel Feiler relative to Kelly E. See United States Kelly E. See's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.4×
Kelly E. See · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Feiler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Feiler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Feiler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Feiler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Feiler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Feiler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Feiler. The network helps show where Daniel Feiler may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Feiler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Feiler Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Feiler links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2015122
2 201279
3 201972
4 201251
5 201648
6 201721
7 202121
8 202212
9 201711
10 20099
11 20197
12 20225
13 20155
14 20204
15 20193
16 20171
17 20140
18 20130

About Daniel Feiler

Daniel Feiler is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Management Science and Operations Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (57 citations), Marketing (87 citations), Management Information Systems (81 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (106 citations) and Applied Psychology (34 citations). Daniel Feiler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jordan Tong, Adam M. Kleinbaum, Ron Adner, Leigh Plunkett Tost, Adam M. Grant, Richard P. Larrick, Sunita Sah, Jack B. Soll, Joost Rietveld and Annabelle Gawer. Their work appears in journals such as Management Science, Psychological Science, Psychology Public Policy and Law, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Production and Operations Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact