Daniel E. Schoth

38 papers receiving 919 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Schoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Pharmacology 295
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 119
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 211
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 228
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 182
Replace Dagfinn Berntzen with:
Dagfinn Berntzen Norway
Anton J.M. Schmidt Netherlands
Martien G.S. Schrooten Sweden
Klanci M. McCabe United States
James M. Malott United States
Avie James Rainwater United States
Shreela Palit United States
G.Ron Norton Canada
Ana María González‐Roldán Spain
Elena S. Monarch United States
Daniel E. Schoth relative to Dagfinn Berntzen Norway Dagfinn Berntzen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×76×
Dagfinn Berntzen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Schoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Schoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Schoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Schoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Schoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Schoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Schoth. The network helps show where Daniel E. Schoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Schoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Schoth Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Schoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011193
2 201775
3 201958
4 201656
5 200855
6 201352
7 201047
8 201341
9 201035
10 202035
11 201430
12 201825
13 201623
14 201522
15 202022
16 201319
17 201819
18 202019
19 202013
20 202111

About Daniel E. Schoth

Daniel E. Schoth is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (9 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (3 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (295 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (119 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (211 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (228 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (182 citations). Daniel E. Schoth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Christina Liossi, Vanessa Delgado Nunes, Simon P. Liversedge, H. J. Godwin, Karin Mogg, Brendan P. Bradley, Paul White, Richard F. Howard, Line Caes and Emily Jane Harrop. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pain, BMJ Open, Pain, Clinical Journal of Pain and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact