Daniel E. Schoth

1.2k citations
37 papers · 881 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel E. Schoth

37 papers receiving 858 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Schoth
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pharmacology 309
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 219
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 173
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 198
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 209
Replace Marie Kanstrup with:
Marie Kanstrup Sweden
Jeannie A. Sperry United States
Katelynn E. Boerner Canada
Katrien Verstraeten Belgium
Elizabeth J. Richardson United States
Samantha Fashler Canada
Kelly Forys United States
Tony Iezzi Canada
Dokyoung S. You United States
Rachel Atchley United States
Daniel E. Schoth relative to Marie Kanstrup Sweden Marie Kanstrup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marie Kanstrup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Schoth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Schoth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Schoth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Schoth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Schoth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Schoth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Schoth. The network helps show where Daniel E. Schoth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Schoth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Schoth Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Schoth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011178
2 201773
3 201654
4 200853
5 201952
6 201349
7 201046
8 201340
9 201034
10 202032
11 201428
12 201824
13 201621
14 202019
15 201519
16 201318
17 201818
18 202014
19 202012
20 201910

About Daniel E. Schoth

Daniel E. Schoth is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 37 papers that have together received 881 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (12 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (309 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (219 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (173 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (198 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (209 citations). Daniel E. Schoth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christina Liossi, Vanessa Delgado Nunes, Simon P. Liversedge, H. J. Godwin, Glyn D. Williams, Karin Mogg, Brendan P. Bradley, Paul White, Richard F. Howard and Line Caes. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pain, Pain, BMJ Open, Clinical Journal of Pain and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact