Line Caes

2.5k citations
91 papers · 1.8k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Line Caes

84 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Line Caes
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.1k
  • Pharmacy 92
  • Pharmacology 247
  • Clinical Psychology 277
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 56
Replace Robyn Lewis Claar with:
Robyn Lewis Claar United States
Amy S. Lewandowski United States
Paula Forgeron Canada
Deborah A. Van Slyke United States
Gerard A. Banez United States
John T. Goodman Canada
Elena Castarlenas Spain
Rocío de la Vega Spain
Amanda B. Feinstein United States
James M. Malott United States
Line Caes relative to Robyn Lewis Claar United States Robyn Lewis Claar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Robyn Lewis Claar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Caes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Caes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Caes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Caes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Caes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Caes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Caes. The network helps show where Line Caes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Line Caes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Caes Line = papers co-authored together Line Caes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010141
2 2016128
3 2015114
4 201595
5 201489
6 201860
7 201160
8 201951
9 201250
10 201349
11 201147
12 201547
13 201443
14 201542
15 201242
16 202037
17 201636
18 201435
19 202033
20 201432

About Line Caes

Line Caes is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (57 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (16 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (15 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (12 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (8 papers), Infant Health and Development (6 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (4 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.1k citations), Pharmacy (92 citations), Pharmacology (247 citations), Clinical Psychology (277 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (56 citations). Line Caes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Liesbet Goubert, Tine Vervoort, Christopher Eccleston, Christine T. Chambers, Melissa A. Alderfer, Lesley Verhofstadt, Marieke Van Schoors, Kathryn A. Birnie, Abbie Jordan and Zina Trost. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Clinical Journal of Pain, European Journal of Pain and Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact