Daniel E. Croker

3.3k citations
13 papers · 452 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 6
    • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 3
    • Complement system in diseases 5
    • Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms 1

Daniel E. Croker

13 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Daniel E. Croker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Physiology 37
  • Immunology 172
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 110
  • Molecular Biology 296
  • Nephrology 21
Replace Åke Boketoft with:
Åke Boketoft Sweden
M. Rouault France
E. V. Davies United Kingdom
Arvind Nanda Canada
Elias Adriaenssens Belgium
Katrina Boeckeler United Kingdom
Magda A. M. Krajnc-Franken Netherlands
Geneviève Laroche Canada
J.‐E. Månsson Sweden
Siân C. Piper United Kingdom
Daniel E. Croker relative to Åke Boketoft Sweden Åke Boketoft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Åke Boketoft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel E. Croker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel E. Croker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel E. Croker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel E. Croker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel E. Croker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel E. Croker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel E. Croker. The network helps show where Daniel E. Croker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel E. Croker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel E. Croker Line = papers co-authored together Daniel E. Croker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 200871
2 200970
3 201660
4 201455
5 200350
6 201341
7 201640
8 201630
9 201414
10 201211
11 20186
12
Discovery and pharmacology of conopressin-T, a novel vasopressin-like peptide from Conus tulipa.
20062
13 20122

About Daniel E. Croker

Daniel E. Croker is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Hematology and Social Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Complement system in diseases (5 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (1 paper) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (37 citations), Immunology (172 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (110 citations), Molecular Biology (296 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). Daniel E. Croker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew A. Cooper, Reena Halai, Richard J. Lewis, Paul F. Alewood, Geraldine Kaeslin, David P. Fairlie, Peter N. Monk, Elka Palant, Dianne Alewood and Andreas Brust. Their work appears in journals such as Immunology and Cell Biology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Scientific Reports and Immunobiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact