Daniel DeWoskin

460 citations
8 papers · 368 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel DeWoskin

8 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Daniel DeWoskin
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 236
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 167
  • Aging 15
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 95
  • Biophysics 18
Replace Christoph Schmal with:
Christoph Schmal Germany
Casey O. Diekman United States
Stephanie R. Taylor United States
P.F. Thaben Germany
Naoto Hayasaka Japan
Yongho Kwak South Korea
Adrián E. Granada Germany
Andrew H. Bahle United States
Janina Hesse Germany
Daniel DeWoskin relative to Christoph Schmal Germany Christoph Schmal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.9×
Christoph Schmal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel DeWoskin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel DeWoskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel DeWoskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel DeWoskin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel DeWoskin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel DeWoskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel DeWoskin. The network helps show where Daniel DeWoskin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel DeWoskin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel DeWoskin Line = papers co-authored together Daniel DeWoskin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2015144
2 2015117
3 201640
4 200927
5 201425
6 201212
7
Dynamic models of metastatic tumor growth
20112
8 20091

About Daniel DeWoskin

Daniel DeWoskin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (2 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (2 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper), Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth (1 paper) and Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (236 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (167 citations), Aging (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (95 citations) and Biophysics (18 citations). Daniel DeWoskin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Daniel B. Forger, Jihwan Myung, Toru Takumi, Erik De Schutter, Sungho Hong, Mino D. C. Belle, Hugh D. Piggins, Rita M. Cowell, Javier Arsuaga and Karen L. Gamble. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Interface Focus, Nature Communications, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics and Topology and its Applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact