Daniel C. Moore

2.5k citations
67 papers · 1.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Moore

63 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 552
  • Surgery 1.2k
  • Oral Surgery 136
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 214
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 241
Replace L. Donald Bridenbaugh with:
L. Donald Bridenbaugh United States
Gale E. Thompson United States
Phillip O. Bridenbaugh United States
Mikko Pitkänen Finland
M. Tuominen Finland
M. Pinaud France
Marco Berti Italy
Brendan T. Finucane Canada
P. Péré Finland
Herbert Koinig Austria
Daniel C. Moore relative to L. Donald Bridenbaugh United States L. Donald Bridenbaugh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
L. Donald Bridenbaugh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Moore. The network helps show where Daniel C. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981141
2 1970109
3 197294
4 199088
5 198285
6 197882
7 196482
8 197668
9 197054
10
Spinal anesthesia: bupivacaine compared with tetracaine.
198052
11 196849
12 197049
13 198047
14 196045
15 197042
16 198136
17 198536
18 198835
19 197734
20 198234

About Daniel C. Moore

Daniel C. Moore is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (39 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (20 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (14 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (11 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (9 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (9 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers) and Medical History and Innovations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (552 citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Oral Surgery (136 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (214 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (241 citations). Daniel C. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include L. Donald Bridenbaugh, Phillip O. Bridenbaugh, Gale E. Thompson, Manbir S. Batra, Geoffrey T. Tucker, Robert I. Balfour, William H. Bush, Gordon M. Wyant, William M. Glazer and Hal Morgenstern. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Journal of the American Medical Association, JAMA and British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact