Daniel C. Moore

2.5k citations
86 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel C. Moore

79 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Daniel C. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 666
  • Surgery 1.4k
  • Oral Surgery 178
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 259
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 292
Replace Gale E. Thompson with:
Gale E. Thompson United States
L. Donald Bridenbaugh United States
Phillip O. Bridenbaugh United States
Alon P. Winnie United States
Mikko T. Pitkanen Finland
Joseph M. Neal United States
Marjatta K. Tuominen Finland
Dan J. Kopacz United States
Brendan T. Finucane Canada
Julia E. Pollock United States
Daniel C. Moore relative to Gale E. Thompson United States Gale E. Thompson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gale E. Thompson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel C. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel C. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel C. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel C. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel C. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel C. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel C. Moore. The network helps show where Daniel C. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel C. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel C. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Daniel C. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981179
2 1970121
3 1972108
4 1982102
5 1964100
6 197894
7 199093
8 197669
9 198060
10 196058
11 197058
12
Spinal anesthesia: bupivacaine compared with tetracaine.
198054
13 196851
14 197049
15 198843
16 197043
17 198242
18 198538
19 198138
20 197736

About Daniel C. Moore

Daniel C. Moore is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 86 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (51 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (25 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (18 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (13 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (11 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (9 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (8 papers) and Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (666 citations), Surgery (1.4k citations), Oral Surgery (178 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (259 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (292 citations). Daniel C. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include L. Donald Bridenbaugh, Phillip O. Bridenbaugh, Manbir S. Batra, Gale E. Thompson, Geoffrey T. Tucker, Robert I. Balfour, William H. Bush, Gordon M. Wyant, David L. Brown and William M. Glazer. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia, JAMA, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact