Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

4.7k papers and 94.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.7k papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 94.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine usually cover Surgery (3.6k papers), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (1.2k papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (3.0k papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (1.0k papers) and Nausea and vomiting management (756 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine are Terese T. Horlocker, Vincent Chan, Joseph M. Neal, Guy Weinberg, Quinn H. Hogan, Philip Peng, Ki Jinn Chin, Michael F. Mulroy, Anahi Perlas and Christopher L. Wu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025