Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

103.4k citations
5.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Pain Management and Opioid Use
    • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Surgery top 1%
    • Anesthesia and Pain Management
    • Nausea and vomiting management
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment

Papers in

    • Pain Management and Treatment 270
    • Pain Management and Opioid Use 257
  • Surgery 3.0k
    • Anesthesia and Pain Management 2.6k
    • Nausea and vomiting management 350
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 247

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

3.8k papers receiving 82.5k citations

Peers

Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
Comparison fields: 5 of 208
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 15.5k
  • Surgery 66.7k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 15.5k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 9.5k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 2.0k
Replace Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie with:
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie Canada
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia United States
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Germany
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Australia
Acta Neurochirurgica Germany
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Sweden
Journal of International Medical Research China
World Neurosurgery United States
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Germany
Current Medical Research and Opinion United States
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine relative to Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie Canada Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

About Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine

The 5.0k papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 103.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine usually cover Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (805 papers), Surgery (3.0k papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (692 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (89 papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (454 papers) specifically the topics of Anesthesia and Pain Management (2.6k papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (635 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (403 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (350 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (270 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (257 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (247 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (239 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine are Terese T. Horlocker, Joseph M. Neal, Vincent Chan, Guy Weinberg, Quinn H. Hogan, Ki Jinn Chin, Philip Peng, Michael F. Mulroy, Anahi Perlas and Christopher L. Wu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact