Daniel Brito

61 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Brito
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Ecological Modeling 519
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 470
  • Ecology 861
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 397
  • Paleontology 143
Replace Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira‐Santos with:
Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira‐Santos Brazil
Carly Waterman United Kingdom
Kim M. Howell Tanzania
Octavio Rojas‐Soto Mexico
Elisa Bonaccorso Ecuador
James T. Stroud United States
Daniel Oliveira Mesquita Brazil
Ricardo J. Sawaya Brazil
Jan Schipper United States
Alessandro Catenazzi United States
Daniel Brito relative to Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira‐Santos Brazil Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira‐Santos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira‐Santos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Brito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Brito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Brito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Brito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Brito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Brito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Brito. The network helps show where Daniel Brito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Brito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Brito Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Brito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011325
2 201382
3 201081
4 201076
5 201451
6 201251
7 200946
8 200843
9 200642
10 201833
11 201330
12 201330
13 200428
14 201426
15 200325
16 200924
17 201423
18 200422
19 201521
20 201420

About Daniel Brito

Daniel Brito is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (27 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers), Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation (13 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (12 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (9 papers) and Primate Behavior and Ecology (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (519 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (470 citations), Ecology (861 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (397 citations) and Paleontology (143 citations). Daniel Brito has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Vinícius Cianciaruso, José Alexandre Felizola Diniz‐Filho, Kamran Safi, Rafael Loyola, Carlos Eduardo Viveiros Grelle, Milena Fiuza Diniz, Monik Oprea, Marina Zanin, Francisço Palomares and Leonardo de Carvalho Oliveira. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, Biological Conservation, Journal for Nature Conservation, Ecology and Evolution and Acta Chiropterologica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact