Animal Conservation

1.9k papers and 54.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Animal Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 54.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Animal Conservation usually cover Ecology (1.5k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (646 papers) and Global and Planetary Change (453 papers) specifically the topics of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (1.2k papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (401 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (345 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Animal Conservation are Amy Dickman, Roșie Woodroffe, David H. Reed, Timothy G. O’Brien, Bernard M. Kissui, Richard Frankham, Margaret F. Kinnaird, Michael L. McKinney, David W. Macdonald and Hariyo T. Wibisono.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Animal Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Animal Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Animal Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Animal Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Animal Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Animal Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Animal Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025