Daniel Berg

1.1k citations
15 papers · 698 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Berg

15 papers receiving 653 citations

Peers

Daniel Berg
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Finance 342
  • Statistics and Probability 127
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 82
  • Accounting 99
  • Economics and Econometrics 184
Replace Jonathan Stroud with:
Jonathan Stroud United States
Eike Brechmann Germany
Gabriel Frahm Germany
Jiahui Wang China
David Beaudoin Canada
Álvaro Veiga Brazil
Beatriz Vaz de Melo Mendes Brazil
Vasco d'Orey United States
Walter Vecchiato Italy
Rafael Schmidt Germany
Daniel Berg relative to Jonathan Stroud United States Jonathan Stroud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan Stroud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Berg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Berg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Berg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Berg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Berg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Berg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Berg. The network helps show where Daniel Berg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Berg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Berg Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Berg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008211
2 2009183
3 200677
4 201043
5 201832
6
Models for construction of multivariate dependence
200730
7 201625
8 200925
9 201622
10 201916
11
A Goodness-of-fit Test for Copulae Based on the Probability Integral Transform
200513
12 20209
13
Local sensitivity analyses of goodness-of-fit tests for copulas
20076
14
Deterministic consistency estimation in refining processes
20035
15 20211

About Daniel Berg

Daniel Berg is a scholar working on Finance, Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Civil and Structural Engineering and Statistics and Probability, having authored 15 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling (6 papers), Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing (5 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (5 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (4 papers), Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications (3 papers), Credit Risk and Financial Regulations (3 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (3 papers) and Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (342 citations), Statistics and Probability (127 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (82 citations), Accounting (99 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (184 citations). Daniel Berg has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kjersti Aas, Kurt Roth, Jean‐François Quessy, Rada Dakovic, Claudia Czado, Ole Klein, Matthias Bartelmann, P. A. Troch, Anders Karlström and M. Gustavsson. Their work appears in journals such as Hydrology and earth system sciences, European Journal of Finance, Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Vadose Zone Journal and New Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact