Daniel Amos

22 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Daniel Amos
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Architecture 21
  • Media Technology 58
  • Social Psychology 126
  • Building and Construction 73
  • Management Science and Operations Research 61
Replace Ben F. Bigelow with:
Ben F. Bigelow United States
Jonathan Weston Elliott United States
Cindy L. Menches United States
Kevin Wall South Africa
Madeline Polmear United States
Linda Too Australia
Aida Olivia Pereira de Carvalho Guerra Denmark
Norman D. Dennis United States
Edward Ayebeng Botchway Ghana
Patricia Galilea Chile
Daniel Amos relative to Ben F. Bigelow United States Ben F. Bigelow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Ben F. Bigelow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Amos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Amos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Amos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Amos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Amos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Amos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Amos. The network helps show where Daniel Amos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Amos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Amos Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Amos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202073
2 202038
3 201935
4 201935
5 202025
6 202015
7 202114
8 202012
9 202010
10 20217
11
Challenges of Real Estate Development in Ghana from the Developers' Perspective
20155
12 20225
13 20214
14 20204
15 19863
16
Energy Management in Public Higher Education Institutions in Ghana
20163
17 20202
18 20232
19 20202
20 20261

About Daniel Amos

Daniel Amos is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Building and Construction and General Health Professions, having authored 24 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facilities and Workplace Management (16 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (8 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (3 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Architecture (21 citations), Media Technology (58 citations), Social Psychology (126 citations), Building and Construction (73 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (61 citations). Daniel Amos has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Malaysia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cheong Peng Au-Yong, Andrew Jocuns, Reed Stevens, Lari Garrison, Hafez Salleh, Ali Mohammed Alashwal, Maimunah Sapri, Low Sheau-Ting, Zulkiflee Abdul-Samad and Tori Bailey. Their work appears in journals such as Facilities, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Journal of Facilities Management, Engineering Construction & Architectural Management and Building Research & Information.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact