Daniel A. Bell

4.7k citations
80 papers · 1.5k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel A. Bell

75 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Daniel A. Bell
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Political Science and International Relations 639
  • Sociology and Political Science 814
  • Development 47
  • Cultural Studies 88
  • Education 250
Replace Raymond Aron with:
Raymond Aron France
Tatu Vanhanen Finland
David A. Hollinger United States
John Ishiyama United States
Mary Poovey United States
Michael Kämmen United States
Sandra Taylor Australia
A. James Gregor United States
Susan Hekman United States
Peter T. Manicas United States
Daniel A. Bell relative to Raymond Aron France Raymond Aron's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.6×
Raymond Aron · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel A. Bell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel A. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel A. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel A. Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel A. Bell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel A. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel A. Bell. The network helps show where Daniel A. Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel A. Bell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel A. Bell Line = papers co-authored together Daniel A. Bell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015202
2 2003112
3 200083
4 201678
5 201077
6 200771
7 199561
8 201148
9 199640
10 200837
11 201035
12 202035
13 200633
14 201028
15 200328
16 201328
17
Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller's Political Philosophy
200527
18 197026
19 201324
20 199724

About Daniel A. Bell

Daniel A. Bell is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (20 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (3 papers), Academic Freedom and Politics (2 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (2 papers) and Writing and Handwriting Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (639 citations), Sociology and Political Science (814 citations), Development (47 citations), Cultural Studies (88 citations) and Education (250 citations). Daniel A. Bell has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thaddeus Metz, Terezinha Nuñes, Avner de‐Shalit, David Martin Jones, Kanishka Jayasuriya, David Brown, Chenyang Li, Irving Kristol, Deborah Evans and Peter Bryant. Their work appears in journals such as Political Theory, Philosophy East and West, Deafness & Education International, Dao and Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact