Chenyang Li

2.8k citations
114 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chenyang Li

95 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

Chenyang Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Religious studies 76
  • Cultural Studies 107
  • Sociology and Political Science 565
  • Political Science and International Relations 221
  • Social Psychology 159
Replace Richard Kearney with:
Richard Kearney United States
Roland A. Champagne United States
Stephen Heath South Korea
Judith T. Irvine United States
Gerard J. Steen Netherlands
Christine Brooke‐Rose United Kingdom
Bruce Wilshire United States
Stefan Hirschauer Germany
Catherine Porter United Kingdom
Monika Fludernik Germany
Chenyang Li relative to Richard Kearney United States Richard Kearney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Richard Kearney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chenyang Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chenyang Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenyang Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenyang Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chenyang Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenyang Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenyang Li. The network helps show where Chenyang Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chenyang Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chenyang Li Line = papers co-authored together Chenyang Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006186
2 2013102
3 199480
4 200865
5
The Sage and the Second Sex: Confucianism, Ethics, and Gender
200051
6 200740
7 200840
8 199740
9 201237
10 201328
11 201725
12 201423
13 201518
14 201818
15 200017
16 202116
17 202216
18 199716
19 200415
20 200213

About Chenyang Li

Chenyang Li is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (42 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (8 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (7 papers), Ethics in medical practice (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (5 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (76 citations), Cultural Studies (107 citations), Sociology and Political Science (565 citations), Political Science and International Relations (221 citations) and Social Psychology (159 citations). Chenyang Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, Singapore and United States. Frequent co-authors include Suzanne Cahill, Daniel A. Bell, Franklin Perkins, Michael L. Naraine, Bo Li, Li Yang, Yanjie Ji, Li Sun, Qingyue Meng and Kara Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Dao, Hypatia, Sleep Medicine and Asian Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact